From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:10:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] sensors.conf manpage name Message-Id: <4AC31279.1020106@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <4AC1C369.8090901@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4AC1C369.8090901@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 09/29/2009 02:57 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:20:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I just received this bug report: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?idR6178 >> >> Which makes sense, so now I was thinking how to best handle this. We >> can make a sensors3.conf.5 symlink to sensors.conf.5 or we can just >> rename it. There is something to be said for both cases. >> >> sensors3.conf is the new default name, but sensors.conf is still used >> as a fallback by libsensors. >> >> So what is your 2 cents on this ? > > I believe a symlink would solve the problem better. If we rename the > man page, then I can see old-timers complain next time they try "man > sensors.conf" and it fails. And as you said, both names are equally > valid. > Ok, so a symlink it is. Hmm: [hans@localhost trunk]$ svn update svn: OPTIONS of 'http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk': could not connect to server (http://lm-sensors.org) [hans@localhost trunk]$ Am I doing something wrong, or ? Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors