From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: About profiling xen Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:19:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4AC3E767.6040508@goop.org> References: <196324.1267.qm@web94604.mail.in2.yahoo.com> <20090930063747.GG1434@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Marco Tizzoni Cc: "Fajar A." , Fasiha Ashraf , xen , xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/30/09 00:45, Marco Tizzoni wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Marco Tizzoni wrote: > =20 >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wr= ote: >> =20 >>> 250 per second.. sounds like kernel HZ value? >>> =20 >> Yes, infact I'm going to test it with 1000Khz. Stay tuned. >> =20 > Building dom0 kernel with 1000hz the rate reach 1k. Ok, one point. Then= ? > Why this behaviour occurs only on xenolinux? > =20 Which kernel are you using? Do you have: CONFIG_NO_HZ=3Dy CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=3Dy configured? J