From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?G=E1sp=E1r_Lajos?= <swifty@freemail.hu>
Subject: Re: Using iptables with high volume mail
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:40:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4AC4DB93.6060707@freemail.hu>
References: <594040.85734.qm@web53111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <1254412984.11386.63.camel@enterprise.ims-firmen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1254412984.11386.63.camel@enterprise.ims-firmen.de>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
Cc: John Little <jlittle_97@yahoo.com>, netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Thomas Jacob =EDrta:
> This all really depends on the number of new connections and packets =
per
> time, rather than the number of emails.
>  =20
Agree.
But I would also check the upstream bandwidth and concurrent connection=
s=20
per time or per destination.

Swifty