From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4AC5F4EC.6040803@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:41:16 +0200
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4AC5E2B7.9020701@domain.hid>
	<b88603c30910020458n62c14adfp4bf27b63bb801425@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <b88603c30910020458n62c14adfp4bf27b63bb801425@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] FCSE patch.
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Henri Roosen <henriroosen@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai core <Xenomai-core@domain.hid>

Henri Roosen wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> 
> We are using the FCSE on our at91sam9263 boards because we need the
> lowest latency. Our measurements show almost a factor of 2 in latency
> reduction, which is very similar to what you presented at the XUM.

Good to know.

> 
> Are there any known issues with FCSE at the moment as included for the
> 2.6.28 kernel?

None that I know of. We tried hard to validate the patch.

> Let's hope the patch gets picked up and maintained by
> the kernel developers. If not, will Xenomai keep supporting it for
> upcoming kernels?

Yes, definitely.

-- 
					    Gilles.