From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Cc: "James Blanford" <jhblanford@gmail.com>,
"Erik Andrén" <erik.andren@gmail.com>,
"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: PATCH: gscpa stv06xx + ov518: dont discard every other frame
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:41:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC8C227.4000301@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 954 bytes --]
Hi,
As noticed by James Blanford <jhblanford@gmail.com>, we were discarding
every other frame in stv06xx and the ov518 (part of ov519.c) drivers.
When we call gspca_frame_add, it returns a pointer to the frame passed in,
unless we call it with LAST_PACKET, when it will return a pointer to a
new frame in which to store the frame data for the next frame. So whenever
calling:
gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, LAST_PACKET, frame, data, len);
we should do this as:
frame = gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, LAST_PACKET, frame, data, len);
So that any further data got from of the pkt we are handling in pkt_scan, goes
to the next frame.
We are not doing this in stv06xx.c pkt_scan method, which the cause of what
James is seeing. So I started checking all drivers, and we are not doing this
either in ov519.c when handling an ov518 bridge. So now the framerate of my
3 ov518 test cams has just doubled. Thanks James!
The attached patch fixes this.
Regards,
Hans
[-- Attachment #2: gspca-dont-discard-every-other-frame.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1164 bytes --]
diff -r 5ad36b0c0e90 linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/ov519.c
--- a/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/ov519.c Sun Oct 04 16:23:04 2009 +0200
+++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/ov519.c Sun Oct 04 17:26:43 2009 +0200
@@ -2939,7 +2939,7 @@
/* A false positive here is likely, until OVT gives me
* the definitive SOF/EOF format */
if ((!(data[0] | data[1] | data[2] | data[3] | data[5])) && data[6]) {
- gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, LAST_PACKET, frame, data, 0);
+ frame = gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, LAST_PACKET, frame, data, 0);
gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, FIRST_PACKET, frame, data, 0);
sd->packet_nr = 0;
}
diff -r 5ad36b0c0e90 linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/stv06xx/stv06xx.c
--- a/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/stv06xx/stv06xx.c Sun Oct 04 16:23:04 2009 +0200
+++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/stv06xx/stv06xx.c Sun Oct 04 17:26:43 2009 +0200
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@
PDEBUG(D_PACK, "End of frame detected");
/* Complete the last frame (if any) */
- gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, LAST_PACKET, frame, data, 0);
+ frame = gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, LAST_PACKET, frame, data, 0);
if (chunk_len)
PDEBUG(D_ERR, "Chunk length is "
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-04 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-04 15:41 Hans de Goede [this message]
2009-10-04 16:24 ` PATCH: gscpa stv06xx + ov518: dont discard every other frame Erik Andrén
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC8C227.4000301@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=erik.andren@gmail.com \
--cc=jhblanford@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moinejf@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.