From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Preserve guest single-stepping on register
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC9CDFA.1000501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC8F145.4000204@web.de>
On 10/04/2009 09:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> Hmmmm, good point. Mind reverting 2/2 and applying this one instead?
>
> Jan
>
> --------->
>
> KVM: x86: Rework guest single-step flag injection and filtering
>
> Push TF and RF injection and filtering on guest single-stepping into the
> vender get/set_rflags callbacks. This makes the whole mechanism more
> robust /wrt user space IOTCTL order and instruction emulations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 8 +++++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 279a2ae..407e1a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -797,11 +797,17 @@ static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static unsigned long svm_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.rflags;
> + unsigned long rflags = to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.rflags;
> +
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug& KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
> + rflags&= ~(unsigned long)(X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_RF);
> + return rflags;
> }
>
> static void svm_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags)
> {
> + if (vcpu->guest_debug& KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
> + rflags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_RF;
> to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.rflags = rflags;
> }
>
This code is duplicated in vmx. How about kvm_[gs]et_rflags to contain it?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AC67D94.6090406@web.de>
2009-10-02 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Preserve guest single-stepping on register Jan Kiszka
[not found] ` <4AC8B63B.8060602@redhat.com>
2009-10-04 19:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-10-05 10:44 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-10-05 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Rework guest single-step flag injection and filtering Jan Kiszka
2009-10-05 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC9CDFA.1000501@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.