From: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
john.cooper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] virtio_blk: deprecate the 1024-byte ID field.
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:20:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACA1CBC.8020402@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909300941.24736.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Dienstag 29 September 2009 19:18:09 schrieb Rusty Russell:
>> PCI, lguest and s390 can all only support 256-byte configuration
>> space. So, this giant field broke just about everyone.
>> Unfortunately, removing it is not so simple: we don't want to break
>> old userspace, but we're going to want to re-use that part of the
>> struct.
>>
>> So, modern users can #define VIRTIO_BLK_IDENTIFY_DEPRECATED to indicate
>> that they know it's no longer in the config struct, and can use any
>> new features (all new features which add a configuration field will
>> conflict with this deprecated one).
>
>
> Since s390 never used the giant id field, it would be ok for us just delete it
> (without the #define). IIRC kvm-userspace also never used that. Since qemu
> upstream seems to use that field your way seems to be the only compatible...
It seems simply retiring use of the VIRTIO_BLK_F_IDENTIFY
binary value should be sufficient. The patch which
implemented the cooperating logic in qemu was dropped
due to the config space issue. So the case of a virtio_blk
driver successfully negotiating the feature and trying to
access the now depreciated structure area should effectively
be a non-issue. The bit value can be reclaimed for reuse
in the future when concern over any suspected usage falls
into the noise.
-john
--
john.cooper@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 17:18 [PATCH 1/4] virtio_blk: deprecate the 1024-byte ID field Rusty Russell
2009-09-30 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-09-30 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-10-05 16:20 ` john cooper [this message]
2009-10-06 9:21 ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-07 5:48 ` john cooper
2009-10-07 5:48 ` john cooper
2009-10-05 16:20 ` john cooper
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-29 17:18 Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACA1CBC.8020402@redhat.com \
--to=john.cooper@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.