From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>,
Bas Couwenberg <bas@news-service.com>, XFS List <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:04:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACB080D.3010708@news-service.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005214348.GA15448@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> It helps a bit, but not so much. I suspect it could be a double free
> of an inode, and I have identified a possible race window that could
> explain it. But all the traces are really weird and I think only show
> later symptoms of something that happened earlier. I'll come up with
> a patch for the race window ASAP, but could you in the meantime turn on
> CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG for the test kernel to see if it triggers somehwere
> and additionally apply the tiny patch below for additional debugging?
Will try this.
Could this by any change be releated (from 2.6.32.2)?
commit 2f0ffb7ef75a9ad6140899f6d4df45e8a73a013e
Author: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: Mon Sep 21 17:01:06 2009 -0700
fs: make sure data stored into inode is properly seen before
unlocking new inode
commit 580be0837a7a59b207c3d5c661d044d8dd0a6a30 upstream.
In theory it could happen that on one CPU we initialize a new inode
but clearing of I_NEW | I_LOCK gets reordered before some of the
initialization. Thus on another CPU we return not fully uptodate inode
from iget_locked().
This seems to fix a corruption issue on ext3 mounted over NFS.
Thanks,
Patrick Schreurs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 10:27 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-09-17 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-29 10:15 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-29 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-30 10:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-30 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-02 14:24 ` Bas Couwenberg
2009-10-05 21:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 9:04 ` Patrick Schreurs [this message]
2009-10-07 1:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-08 8:45 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 7:43 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 23:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-15 15:06 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-18 23:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-20 3:40 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-21 9:45 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-22 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-27 10:41 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
[not found] ` <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-30 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-03 14:46 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-11-14 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <4B0A8075.8080008@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20091211115932.GA20632@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <4B3F9F88.9030307@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20100107110446.GA13802@discord.disaster>
[not found] ` <4B45CFAC.4000607@news-service.com>
2010-01-08 11:31 ` [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) Dave Chinner
2010-01-11 20:22 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-01-15 11:01 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-01 16:52 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 10:16 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-09 8:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-09 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 12:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 15:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-24 18:30 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-25 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-01 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACB080D.3010708@news-service.com \
--to=patrick@news-service.com \
--cc=bas@news-service.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=tommy@news-service.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.