From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"joserenato.santos@hp.com" <joserenato.santos@hp.com>,
"JBeulich@novell.com" <JBeulich@novell.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Steven Smith <Steven.Smith@eu.citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:46:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACBBABF.3040909@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A68E5C79@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
On 10/06/09 13:41, Ian Pratt wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:35:42PM +0100, steven.smith@citrix.com wrote:
>>
>>> This patch series includes all of the Xen and tools bits of
>>> netchannel2. It's essentially similar to the one I posted on Sunday,
>>> except:
>>>
>>> -- I've dropped the unmodified drivers support. It'd probably be
>>> fairly straightforward to re-introduce it, but it's not clear that
>>> anyone's actually using unmodified drivers any more (they don't
>>> even build against a 2.6.27 kernel, for instance).
>>>
>> At least Redhat/Fedora guys have been thinking of shipping pv-on-hvm Xen
>> drivers for Fedora 12 / RHEL6.. But I don't know what's the status of
>> that.
>>
> Yes, this certainly isn't a feature we want to drop. In fact, it would be good to see the pv-on-hvm drivers modified to use some of the pvops functions where available.
>
Don Dutile from RH is actively working on this.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-06 15:35 [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] Simplify include/xen/grant_table.h a bit: steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] Slightly more accurate dependency tracking for the .c and .h files in steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] Optimize memcpy for x86 arch. If source buffers does not start at a 64 steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] Rename the struct grant_entry to struct grant_entry_v1, so that it steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] Introduce a grant_entry_v2 structure steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] Implement sub-page grant support steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] Transitive " steven.smith
2009-10-06 15:35 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] Tools-side support for creating and destroying netchannel2 interfaces steven.smith
2009-10-06 20:28 ` [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-10-06 20:41 ` Ian Pratt
2009-10-06 21:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-10-07 1:58 ` [PATCH] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg: re-syncronize ring.h Dutch Meyer
2009-10-07 19:21 ` [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two Steven Smith
2009-10-08 8:07 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-10-08 8:25 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACBBABF.3040909@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Steven.Smith@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=joserenato.santos@hp.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.