From: Warren Togami <wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Seewer Philippe <philippe.seewer-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>,
initramfs <initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert commit "There is only one resolv.conf."
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:21:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACD0669.8010904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB32C08.2000406-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
On 09/18/2009 02:43 AM, Seewer Philippe wrote:
>
>
> Warren Togami wrote:
>> On 09/17/2009 11:24 AM, Seewer Philippe wrote:
>>> Having only one resolv.conf is ok for a booted client. That is the
>>> normal and the usual behaviour is that the first interface to be up and
>>> ready with data is the one to write the contents.
>>>
>>> But inside dracut we really do not want that behaviour. First the
>>> primary interface (see bootdev cmdline argument) might not be the first
>>> interface to come up, second if we are in guess-the-interface mode,
>>> multiple interface might receive different data for resolv.conf and we
>>> have to use the correct stuff to mount.
>>>
>>> So please revert that commit.
>>
>> Do you agree the one copied ultimately should be the interface that
>> successfully netbooted?
>
> Well if you mean by that the one ultimately copied to the booted system
> that is correct. Just use the one /etc/resolv.conf after a successful
> mount.
>
modules.d/40network/netroot:
[ -e /tmp/net.$netif.gw ] && . /tmp/net.$netif.gw
[ -e /tmp/net.$netif.hostname ] && . /tmp/net.$netif.hostname
[ -e /tmp/resolv.conf ] && cp -f /tmp/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf
Previous to this change:
[ -e /tmp/net.$netif.gw ] && . /tmp/net.$netif.gw
[ -e /tmp/net.$netif.hostname ] && . /tmp/net.$netif.hostname
[ -e /tmp/net.$netif.resolv.conf ] && cp -f /tmp/net.$netif.resolv.conf
/etc/resolv.conf
Even the previous version appears to not guarantee that /etc/resolv.conf
is the interface that successfully mounted the rootfs because this
happens before the mount handler in the netroot script.
Could you please suggest a patch? Simply reverting it doesn't seem to
improve things.
Warren Togami
wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 15:24 Please revert commit "There is only one resolv.conf." Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4AB254A3.5000302-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 3:38 ` Warren Togami
[not found] ` <4AB300B8.4090307-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-18 6:43 ` Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4AB32C08.2000406-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-07 21:21 ` Warren Togami [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACD0669.8010904@redhat.com \
--to=wtogami-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=philippe.seewer-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.