From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4ACDA7C6.3090004@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:50:14 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4ACC9BEC.8090200@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4ACC9BEC.8090200@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai on RD129 (Samsung S3C2410A) List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mau Cc: Xenomai-help@domain.hid Mau wrote: > Dear Sirs, > I have found this product from a company near me: > http://www.elpa.it/rd129it.html > It comes with linux preinstalled. > The kernel is a vanilla kernel 2.6.30 with the addition of a few kernel > drivers for unsupported peripherals. > On board there is a cpu Samsung S3C2410A, flash, ram and few other things. > I need to investigate the possibility to install xenomai on this thing. > > I want to know if others have used similar boards with same or similar > processor with success, and how complex can be to make adeos and xenomai > work on such processor. This question is answered on xenomai web site. This is FAQ number 2. http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/FAQs > > The other question is that since we need to apply two patches to the > vanilla kernel (the original + adeos) is there a preferred order? Well, if the order matters, it means that there is a conflict, and if there is a conflict, no matter what order you choose, you will have to solve it. However, if I were you, I would choose to apply the I-pipe patch on the modified kernel sources tree, because it is probably simpler. -- Gilles