* Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use fscanf() instead of read() for showing counter
[not found] <20091007162834.13930.14962.stgit@lb64>
@ 2009-10-08 16:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-10-08 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Eder; +Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
Hannes Eder wrote:
> Read an integer right away with fscanf() instead of read()-ing to a
> buffer, which was actually to small for the terminating '\0', and
> atoi()-ing. Furthermore read() might not read enough, though unlikely
> here.
Also applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-10-08 16:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20091007162834.13930.14962.stgit@lb64>
2009-10-08 16:07 ` [PATCH] conntrack: use fscanf() instead of read() for showing counter Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.