From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: paravirt-dom0: ACPI_PROCESSOR_XEN (bool) depends
	on ACPI_PROCESSOR (tristate)
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:27:31 -0700
Message-ID: <4ACE2F13.3020907@goop.org>
References: <20091005021623.GB7321@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
	<20091008152554.GA12648@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091008152554.GA12648@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 10/08/09 08:25, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Haven't you been asked to _NOT_ do such xen-only changes to core
> subsystem code by several people? Somehow I begin to understand why they
> tend to ignore you.
>   

Sigh.  These patches have not been submitted to upstream, and definitely
need to be refined before I would consider upstreaming them.  But the
purpose of this branch is to accumulate all the work people have been
doing as it currently stands, to provide the most functionality for Xen
users.

Ke Yu is the maintainer of this code, and he's aware of this config
dependency problem.  I'm looking forward to an appropriate fix from him.

    J