From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: kvm or qemu-kvm? Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:03:31 +0400 Message-ID: <4AD0BE63.8070608@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <1254277318.17951.26.camel@markov.biostat.ucsf.edu> <4AC4DBEF.5060408@redhat.com> <1254415862.15462.30.camel@corn.betterworld.us> <4AC4E0A4.9090102@redhat.com> <20091010162811.GD6293@agamemnon.luchs.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Pfeiffer?= Return-path: Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:41275 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753394AbZJJREI (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:04:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091010162811.GD6293@agamemnon.luchs.at> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ren=E9 Pfeiffer wrote: > On Oct 01, 2009 at 1902 +0200, Avi Kivity appeared and said: [] >> Right, stick with your kernel's kvm.ko, qemu-kvm-0.11.0 should make = a >> good fit. >=20 > Just to be sure: If I use Debian Lenny with a kernel from kernel.org, > then I can use the qemu-kvm packages and be fine. Right? If you use kernel from kernel.org and kvm from linux-kvm.org, there's no difference (as far as kvm is concerned) what distribution it is. qemu-kvm-0.11.0 works fine with stock kernels >=3D 2.6.28. Speaking of debian, take a look at http://www.corpit.ru/debian/tls/kvm/= -- ready-to-install debian packages including 0.11.0. (don't add this to sources.list) /mjt