All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org>
To: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfs > md 50% write performance drop on .30+ kernel?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:21:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD454A0.3050704@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3F64F.6070908@sauce.co.nz>

Richard Scobie wrote:
> mark delfman wrote:
>> Hi... in recent tests we are seeing a 50% drop in performance from
>> XFS>MD on a 2.6.30 kernel (compared to a 2.6.28 kernel)
>
>
> Richard Scobie wrote:
> > Started testing a similar machine yesterday - 12GB RAM LSI SAS
> > controller and 16 x WD RE3 1TB SATA md RAID6.
> >
> > With stripe cache set to 16384, I see dd writes of around 290MB/s and
> > when bumped up to 32768 (the maximum), it increases to 407MB.
>
> An omission to the above - the machine is running 
> kernel-2.6.30.8-64.fc11.x86_64.

That performance is amazing for me. With 2.6.31 kernel and 
stripe_cache_size 32768 I got around 185MB/sec dd writes (bs=1M) though 
xfs (or 400MB/sec dd to the device directly). My machine was a dual xeon 
5430 and about 13 SATA Hitachi 7200 rpm disks, MD raid-5, chunk size 
1MB, anticipatory scheduler, no LVM. The controller was a 3ware 9650-16ML .
Do you think it was controller's overhead? I have heard mixed opinions 
about 3wares. What are the fastest controllers around for MD-raid use?

Thank you

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-12 16:58 xfs > md 50% write performance drop on .30+ kernel? mark delfman
2009-10-12 18:40 ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-13  1:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13  1:57   ` NeilBrown
2009-10-13 11:06   ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 11:09     ` Majed B.
     [not found]       ` <66781b10910130412x309d9de2l574ba12a9ed4100a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-13 11:15         ` Majed B.
2009-10-13 11:29           ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 14:30           ` Asdo
2009-10-13 15:13             ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 15:15               ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 22:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-14 19:34       ` mark delfman
2009-10-27 10:28         ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-10-27 11:11           ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2010-01-02  6:54             ` fibre raid
2009-10-13  3:38 ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-13 10:21   ` Asdo [this message]
2009-10-13 10:34     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2009-10-13 14:49       ` Asdo
2009-10-13 19:53     ` Richard Scobie
2009-10-13 21:52       ` mark delfman
2009-10-13 18:49 ` Greg Freemyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD454A0.3050704@shiftmail.org \
    --to=asdo@shiftmail.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.