All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86: unify sys_iopl
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:53:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4B0A0.6050200@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD4A9AE.10306@zytor.com>

On 10/13/09 09:24, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> First of all, the unification looks good.
>
> As far as .32 is concerned... this *is* a bug even if this is only for
> paravirt, and given the small amount of code I am personally OK with
> taking the whole patch for .32.
>
> However, the patch is not complete!  The patch incidentally eliminates
> the need to have assembly stubs for sys_iopl, and those assembly stubs
> should be removed.  I have a patch for that currently test building.
>   

I wasn't sure whether task_pt_regs() needed the full register set to be
saved to correctly return rflags (that is, does PTREGSCALL change the
shape of the stack, or just the contents?).

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-25 22:05 [GIT PULL] x86: unify sys_iopl Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-25 22:56 ` Brian Gerst
2009-09-25 23:22   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-25 23:54     ` Brian Gerst
2009-09-26  0:22       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-13 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 16:24   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-13 16:53     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-10-13 17:13       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-13 17:55       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-13 21:27       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD4B0A0.6050200@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.