From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Rui Santos <rsantos@grupopie.com>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>,
Rainer Fuegenstein <rfu@kaneda.iguw.tuwien.ac.at>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recommended 4port SATA controller ?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:19:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD4EEE5.8040806@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB23978.8090706@grupopie.com>
Rui Santos wrote:
> Greg Freemyer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Rainer Fuegenstein
>> <rfu@kaneda.iguw.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I need to move my 4 disk raid5 array from a motherboard with 4 onboard SATA
>>> ports to a mainboard with just 2 ports. therefore I'm looking for a reliable
>>> and inexpensive 4port PCI controller.
>>>
>>>
>> Rainer,
>>
>> The support chips are not always available in all flavors of PCI, so
>> you need to specify which flavor PCI slots your mother board has.
>>
>> I don't recall seeing a non-raid 4-port "legacy PCI" controller, but I
>> can't say I've looked very hard. Hopefully your motherboard has a
>> "PCI express" slot available.
>>
>> If PCI is all you have, I would go with a pair of SiiG controllers.
>> 2-ports each, but they only cost $30 or so. I have a dozen machines
>> at least with the 2-port SiiG PCI controllers in them and have had no
>> issues with linus drivers, etc.
>>
>>
> There is an Addonics PCI card that will do what you want.
> http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/adsa3r5-e.asp . I have
> one of those.
>
> Advantages:
> - PCI V2.3 66MHz compliant. It will deploy 2.6Gbits/sec.
>
??? I don't know what they mean by "deploy," but I know what 133MB/s
means in the PCI bus standard, and 2.6Gbit isn't it. I suspect that's
max write speed for an N-way raid, N copies of the same data going to
each drive fed from memory at bus max, but it certainly doesn't mean
transfer between storage and memory. Sounds like a spec they put in
advertising, big meaningless (or nearly so) number. Factual, but not a
normal use case.
> - Low profile
> - RAID fetature
> - Support PMP
> - Esata
>
Don't think that's what's desired, could be wrong.
> Disadvantages:
> - Price
> - RAID needs to be set on Windows machine
>
> Check it out...
>
Agree, my BS detector occasionally gets false positives.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Unintended results are the well-earned reward for incompetence.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 11:44 recommended 4port SATA controller ? Rainer Fuegenstein
2009-09-17 11:57 ` Majed B.
2009-09-17 12:49 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-09-17 13:04 ` Jon Lewis
2009-09-17 13:17 ` Max Waterman
2009-09-17 13:28 ` Rui Santos
2009-10-13 21:19 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2009-09-17 13:40 ` Tapani Tarvainen
2009-09-17 14:47 ` Rainer Fuegenstein
2009-09-17 21:52 ` Matt Garman
2009-09-17 22:41 ` Kristleifur Daðason
2009-09-17 23:48 ` Rainer Fuegenstein
2009-09-21 16:29 ` Matt Garman
2009-09-22 14:05 ` Matthias Urlichs
2009-09-17 13:43 ` Christian Pernegger
2009-09-17 14:57 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-17 21:37 ` John Bridges
2009-09-17 23:02 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-17 23:35 ` Kristleifur Daðason
2009-09-17 23:59 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18 10:58 ` mdraid causing mvsas to lockup? (was: Re: recommended 4port SATA controller ?) Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18 23:02 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18 23:02 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-21 16:16 ` mdraid causing mvsas to lockup? Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-21 16:16 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-27 3:34 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-27 3:34 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-18 0:23 ` recommended 4port SATA controller ? John Bridges
2009-09-18 0:52 ` John Bridges
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD4EEE5.8040806@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rfu@kaneda.iguw.tuwien.ac.at \
--cc=rsantos@grupopie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.