From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([81.13.33.159]:51672 "EHLO isrv.corpit.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751813AbZJNGoA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:44:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4AD5730A.20906@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:43:22 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild fixes References: <20091011221818.GA2833@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4AD2EBC6.1000505@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20091013185841.GC5249@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4AD4D2D8.5000904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20091013202036.GA5373@merkur.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20091013202036.GA5373@merkur.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Linus Torvalds , lkml , linux-kbuild Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:19:52PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Sam Ravnborg wrote: [] >>> And please - do not even think of asking me to do it. >> How many patches should one send? How many trees one should >> compare against and send different patch for, in case such >> an obvious trivial cases? If I'll provide this against >> mainline, it wont apply to Sam's tree. > mainline - a replacement patch would have been > what I had expected to see. That's what I didn't think of. Due to the "trivialness" of the whole thing (it's easier to go edit the target file directly than to apply patches), and because.. well.. it didn't occur to me ;) > I took you patch and gave it a hopefully proper > subject and applied it to kbuild-fixes.git. Thank you Sam. /mjt