All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
To: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:16:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD588D9.4040104@ts.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACD907F.7030505@ts.fujitsu.com>

Gianluca,

as the performance of BS2000 seems to be hit by OOS optimization, I'm
thinking of making a patch to disable this feature by a domain parameter.

Is there a way to do this without having to change all places where the
#if statements are placed?
I think there should be some central routines where adding an "if" could
be enough (setting oos_active to 0 seems not to be enough, I fear).

Do you have any hint?


Juergen

Juergen Gross wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Gianluca Guida wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Juergen Gross
>> <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> we've got massive performance problems running a 8 vcpu HVM-guest (BS2000)
>>> under XEN (xen 3.3.1).
>>>
>>> With a specific benchmark producing a rather high load on memory management
>>> operations (lots of process creation/deletion and memory allocation) the 8
>>> vcpu performance was worse than the 4 vcpu performance. On other platforms
>>> (/390, MIPS, SPARC) this benchmark scaled rather well with the number of cpus.
>>>
>>> The result of the usage of the software performance counters of XEN seemed
>>> to point to the shadow lock being the reason. I modified the Hypervisor to
>>> gather some lock statistics (patch will be sent soon) and found that the
>>> shadow lock is really the bottleneck. On average 4 vcpus are waiting to get
>>> the lock!
>>>
>>> Is this a known issue?
>> Acutally, I think so. The OOS optimization is widely known not to be
>> too scalable at 8vcpus in the current state, since its weak point is
>> the CR3 switching time increasing linearly with the number of cpus. If
>> you have lot of processes switches together with lot of PTE writings
>> (as it seems to be the case for your benchmark) then that's probably
>> the cause.
>>
>> Could you try disabling the OOS optimization from the
>> SHADOW_OPTIMIZATIONS definition?
> 
> Great!
> First performance data looks okay!
> We will have to run different benchmarks in different configurations, but I
> think you gave an excellent hint. :-)


-- 
Juergen Gross                 Principal Developer Operating Systems
TSP ES&S SWE OS6                       Telephone: +49 (0) 89 636 47950
Fujitsu Technolgy Solutions               e-mail: juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6                        Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-81739 Muenchen                 Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-14  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-07  6:55 Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus Juergen Gross
2009-10-07  7:26 ` Keir Fraser
2009-10-07  7:49   ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-07  7:56 ` Ian Pratt
2009-10-07  8:08   ` James Harper
2009-10-07  8:13     ` Ian Pratt
2009-10-07  8:31       ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-07  8:17     ` Keir Fraser
2009-10-07  9:12     ` Tim Deegan
2009-10-07  9:40       ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-07 10:11         ` George Dunlap
2009-10-07 11:45           ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-07 13:44             ` George Dunlap
     [not found]             ` <de76405a0910070627s7585c587l8753e40d1d2b77b9@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]               ` <4ACC9C40.3030503@ts.fujitsu.com>
2009-10-07 14:24                 ` George Dunlap
2009-10-08  5:00                   ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-07 10:14         ` Tim Deegan
2009-10-07 12:32           ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-07 16:37 ` Gianluca Guida
2009-10-08  7:10   ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-14  8:16     ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2009-10-14  8:35       ` Keir Fraser
2009-10-14  9:11         ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-14 10:16         ` Gianluca Guida
2009-10-14 10:44           ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-14 10:49             ` Keir Fraser
2009-10-14  8:41       ` Tim Deegan
2009-10-14  9:17         ` Juergen Gross
2009-10-14 11:35       ` Gianluca Guida
2009-10-14 11:43         ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD588D9.4040104@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --to=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.