All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: Kunal Gangakhedkar <kunal.gangakhedkar@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Stable compat-wireless 2.6.32-rc4 released
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:26:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD5EDA4.6090303@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890910140734j196a06f2y8905d3eb1ba1abc8@mail.gmail.com>

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Kunal Gangakhedkar
> <kunal.gangakhedkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 14 Oct 2009 6:20:33 am Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Speaking as a distro, what advantage does the stable wireless backport
>>>> offer for the currently released kernel if we are already consumers of
>>>> stable updates?
>>> Well if you are a distro stuck on the 2.6.31 kernel the stable
>>> compat-wireless-2.6.32 gets you 2.6.32 wireless bits on 2.6.31 and
>>> that means any features/drivers/large fixes/enhancements that didn't
>>> make it to 2.6.31.
>>>
>> Isn't this the whole purpose of linux-backports-modules in ubuntu as well?
> 
> Yes, but lbm currently relies on the bleeding edge compat-wireless
> which is exactly that -- bleeding edge, it may or may not work. The
> stable compat-wireless releases are based on the latest stable kernel
> releases and latest rc kernel release so they are deemed to be stable
> snapshots following the kernel release cycle.
> 
>   Luis
> 

I am currently in the process of adopting compat-wireless-2.6.32-rc4 in
Karmic LBM.

Luis - Have I remembered to thank you for all your hard work?

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-14 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-13 22:42 Stable compat-wireless 2.6.32-rc4 released Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-14  0:25 ` Tim Gardner
2009-10-14  0:50   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-14  6:01     ` Kunal Gangakhedkar
2009-10-14 14:34       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-14 15:26         ` Tim Gardner [this message]
2009-10-14 16:51           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-10-15  5:56         ` Kunal Gangakhedkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD5EDA4.6090303@canonical.com \
    --to=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=kunal.gangakhedkar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.