From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/apic: limit irq affinity
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:30:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD6B364.2050801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091015011339.GA17374@sgi.com>
Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> This patch allows for hard restrictions to irq affinity via a new cpumask and
> device node value in the irq_cfg structure.
>
> The mask forces IRQ affinity to remain within the specified cpu domain.
> On some UV systems, this domain will be limited to the nodes accessible
> to the given node. Currently other X86 systems will have all bits in
> the cpumask set, so non-UV systems will remain unaffected at this time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
>
> ---
>
> Removed UV specific code from generic IO APIC code.
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1
> arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 3
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_irq.h | 1
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_mmrs.h | 25 +++++
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 2
> arch/x86/kernel/uv_irq.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 2009-10-14 12:48:50.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 2009-10-14 15:04:23.000000000 -0500
> @@ -168,6 +168,19 @@ void __init io_apic_disable_legacy(void)
> nr_irqs_gsi = 0;
> }
>
> +void (*set_irq_cfg_allowed)(cpumask_var_t, int) = NULL;
> +/*
> + * Setup IRQ affinity restriction.
> + */
> +static void set_irq_cfg_cpus_allowed(struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg)
> +{
> + if (set_irq_cfg_allowed)
> + set_irq_cfg_allowed(irq_cfg->allowed, irq_cfg->node);
> + else
> + /* Default to allow anything */
> + cpumask_setall(irq_cfg->allowed);
> +}
> +
> int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
> {
> struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> @@ -183,8 +196,11 @@ int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> desc = irq_to_desc(i);
> desc->chip_data = &cfg[i];
> + cfg->node = node;
> zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg[i].domain, GFP_NOWAIT, node);
> zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg[i].old_domain, GFP_NOWAIT, node);
> + zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg[i].allowed, GFP_NOWAIT, node);
> + set_irq_cfg_cpus_allowed(&cfg[i]);
> if (i < nr_legacy_irqs)
> cpumask_setall(cfg[i].domain);
> }
> @@ -213,12 +229,19 @@ static struct irq_cfg *get_one_free_irq_
> if (cfg) {
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg->domain, GFP_ATOMIC, node)) {
> kfree(cfg);
> - cfg = NULL;
> - } else if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg->old_domain,
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg->old_domain,
> GFP_ATOMIC, node)) {
> free_cpumask_var(cfg->domain);
> kfree(cfg);
> - cfg = NULL;
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&cfg->allowed, GFP_ATOMIC, node)) {
> + free_cpumask_var(cfg->old_domain);
> + free_cpumask_var(cfg->domain);
> + kfree(cfg);
> + return NULL;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -231,12 +254,14 @@ int arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc
>
> cfg = desc->chip_data;
> if (!cfg) {
> - desc->chip_data = get_one_free_irq_cfg(node);
> + cfg = desc->chip_data = get_one_free_irq_cfg(node);
> if (!desc->chip_data) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "can not alloc irq_cfg\n");
> BUG_ON(1);
> }
> }
> + cfg->node = node;
> + set_irq_cfg_cpus_allowed(cfg);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -318,6 +343,10 @@ void arch_init_copy_chip_data(struct irq
>
> memcpy(cfg, old_cfg, sizeof(struct irq_cfg));
>
> + cfg->node = node;
> +
> + set_irq_cfg_cpus_allowed(cfg);
> +
> init_copy_irq_2_pin(old_cfg, cfg, node);
> }
>
> @@ -1428,16 +1457,23 @@ static void setup_IO_APIC_irq(int apic_i
> struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> struct IO_APIC_route_entry entry;
> unsigned int dest;
> + cpumask_var_t tmp_mask;
>
> if (!IO_APIC_IRQ(irq))
> return;
>
> cfg = desc->chip_data;
>
> - if (assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus()))
> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tmp_mask, GFP_ATOMIC))
> return;
>
> - dest = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(cfg->domain, apic->target_cpus());
> + if (!cpumask_and(tmp_mask, apic->target_cpus(), cfg->allowed))
> + goto error;
> +
> + if (assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, tmp_mask))
> + goto error;
> +
> + dest = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(cfg->domain, tmp_mask);
can you check if we can reuse target_cpus for this purpose?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-15 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 16:02 [PATCH] x86: SGU UV Fix irq affinity for hub based interrupts Dimitri Sivanich
2009-09-30 16:10 ` Robin Holt
2009-10-12 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 20:32 ` [PATCH] x86: Move SGI UV functionality out of generic IO-APIC code Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-14 8:18 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
[not found] ` <20091012193704.GA8708@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20091014071014.GK784@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20091014120225.GA9674@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20091014122653.GA15048@elte.hu>
2009-10-15 1:13 ` [PATCH v2] x86/apic: limit irq affinity Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-15 5:30 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-10-15 13:50 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-20 12:56 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v3] " Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-20 18:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-21 1:06 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-21 1:12 ` [PATCH v4] " Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-08 13:07 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/apic: Limit " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-08 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 16:02 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-10 4:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 16:31 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-10 17:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 18:57 ` [PATCH] Remove SMP ifdef from irq_desc Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-16 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-10-14 8:17 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: SGI UV: Fix irq affinity for hub based interrupts tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD6B364.2050801@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.