From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MyV8w-00039L-QT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:33:42 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MyV8s-00033w-10
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:33:42 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37731 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyV8r-00033l-RF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:33:37 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:39878)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1MyV8r-0008Ha-G2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:33:37 -0400
Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so1485137fxm.9
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AD76AFA.4070400@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:33:30 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module
References: <1255037747-3340-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>	<1255037747-3340-2-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>	<4AD72B88.2040107@codemonkey.ws>	<20091015122622.1f93ea2d@doriath>	<4AD74134.3080506@codemonkey.ws>
	<20091015141732.2eb9328b@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20091015141732.2eb9328b@doriath>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I'd like to see that and I'd like to see string parsing.  We can 
>> rewrite the parser later.
>>     
>
>  Great!
>
>  I have some concerns about string parsing though, can we make it very
> simple? Like, only valid as keys and not expect anything fancy inside
> the string delimiters?
>   

Yup.  My main concern is that I don't want to convert all of the various 
commands only to have to revisit them to introduce a new formatting syntax.

>  Otherwise I think it would be easier to make it part of a grammar, 
> which sounds like a good future improvement.
>   

Regards,

Anthony Liguori