Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 10/18/2009 04:06 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>   Integration with QObjects is a killer feature, I think it's the
>>> stronger argument against grabbing one from the internet.
>>
>> Yeah, I'd say let's go with Anthony's stuff.  I'll rebase the encoder 
>> on top of it soonish (I still think it's best if JSON encoding lies 
>> in QObject like a kind of toString).  If we'll need the asynchronous 
>> parsing later, we can easily replace it with mine or Vincent's.
>
> One thing I want to add as a feature to the 0.12 release is a nice 
> client API.  To have this, we'll need message boundary identification 
> and a JSON encoder.  I'll focus on the message boundary identification 
> today.

Here's a first pass.  I'll clean up this afternoon and post a proper 
patch.  It turned out to work pretty well.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori