From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] Add udev rule Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:04:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4ADC8016.80005@codemonkey.ws> References: <20091019105923.3988.42243.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <20091019105924.3988.4209.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <4ADC76BF.9050308@codemonkey.ws> <4ADC7963.10008@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com ([209.85.220.227]:44466 "EHLO mail-fx0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756433AbZJSPE5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:04:57 -0400 Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so5015463fxm.17 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:05:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ADC7963.10008@siemens.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Kiszka wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> >> I believe F12 is installing it 666. If we think it's safe, it's >> probably the right thing to do. >> > > Err, you mean /dev/kvm, not this rules file, right? > Yeah, not enough caffeine yet.. > Well, in theory it should be safe, but I would currently leave this > decision to the person finally building a package out of kvm-kmod or > doing some post-install adjustment on a concrete system. Better safe > than sorry, specifically as kvm-kmod may contain the latest bleeding edge. > Sure, but I think distros should be more conservative than upstream. If we're uncomfortable making it 666, then certainly a distro shouldn't do that on it's own. Regards, Anthony Liguori