From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Allow guests to register secondary
	vcpu_time_info
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:49:18 +0900
Message-ID: <4ADCFAFE.3020202@goop.org>
References: <C70205CB.17E32%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<4ADCE55B.8030705@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ADCE55B.8030705@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 10/20/09 07:16, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Looks OK.  One thing: if it's using __copy_to_guest, should it first
> test the handle with guest_handle_okay()?
>   

Oh, I see it happens at the hypercall.  I guess the results of the test
can't be invalidated.

    J