All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix IP_MULTICAST_IF
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:16:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADD3982.2040100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADD3794.8030906@gmail.com>

Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:41:58 +0200
>>
>>> ipv4/ipv6 setsockopt(IP_MULTICAST_IF) have dubious __dev_get_by_index() calls.
>> Dubious, how so?
>>
>> Yes, I know RTNL/dev_base_lock, but it's not using what it gets
>> back at all.
>>
>> It's testing existence, a boolean, it doesn't dereference the
>> 'dev' it gets back at all.
>>
>> This code is intentional and perfectly fine.
> 
> If this was intentional, something changed and made the prereq false.
> 
> Final target might be fine, but an element in the chain, before target
> could be deleted while reader scans hash chain.
> 

BTW, even an insertion can crash a lockless reader, since reader could see a corrupt
 n->next (hlist_add_head() has no barrier between n->next = first and h->first = n;)

static inline void hlist_add_head(struct hlist_node *n, struct hlist_head *h)
{
        struct hlist_node *first = h->first;
        n->next = first;
        if (first)
                first->pprev = &n->next;
        h->first = n;
        n->pprev = &h->first;
}


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-20  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-19 16:41 [PATCH] net: Fix IP_MULTICAST_IF Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  3:59 ` David Miller
2009-10-20  4:07   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  4:16     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-20  4:21       ` David Miller
2009-10-20  4:20     ` David Miller
2009-10-20  4:23       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  4:28         ` David Miller
2009-10-20  5:03           ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce dev_get_by_index_rcu() Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20  5:06             ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-20  5:18               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29  8:43                 ` David Miller
2009-10-20 12:35           ` [PATCH] ifb: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks Eric Dumazet
2009-10-23  4:54             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ADD3982.2040100@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.