From: hzpeterchen@gmail.com (Peter Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Ext3 is supported not well at 2.6.28 for external SD card removal
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:34:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADD4BE0.7050806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091019150321.GE13614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:12:36PM +0800, tommy.hong wrote:
>> hi,you can try EXT4!ext3 is not stable in arm,one of my friends need
>> some ext3 bug in 2.6.25,can cause system halt!
>
> ext3 works fine - it's been used on the old mailing list server for its
> filesystems for hundreds of days (on that exact kernel version) without
> issue.
>
> It's also being used on the web server and older web server both without
> any incident.
>
> All aforementioned machines are ARM based. I can only assume that you
> have local (unreported) issues with ext3 on ARM.
>
The problem I found was removing SD card with ext3 without unmount, It
is ok at 2.6.27 and 2.6.23, but bad at 2.6.28 ( or later, I am not sure).
The problems with ext3 partitioned are:
1. We remove the SD card after the system go to suspend, then, after the
system resume. The system is go to deadlock at __fsync_super: the call
stack like below:
mmc_remove_card-->device_del-->mmc_blk_remove-->del_gendisk
2. When removing SD card without unmount during the system is running,
there are below errors:
mmc1: card d555 removed
mmcblk2: error -110 sending read/write command
mmcblk2: error -110 requesting status
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk2, sector 1576855
Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk2p1, logical block 197099
lost page write due to I/O error on mmcblk2p1
mmcblk2: error -110 sending read/write command
mmcblk2: error -110 requesting status
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk2, sector 1576863
Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk2p1, logical block 197100
lost page write due to I/O error on mmcblk2p1
Aborting journal on device mmcblk2p1.
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at
/home/nchen/work/L28EVB/Dev/sirfa5cb_l28_alpha/kernel/fs/buffer.c:1195
mark_buffer_dirty+0x9c/0xb8()
Modules linked in: sirfsoc_wdt sirfsoc_uspserial g_ether g_usbdrv
ehci_hcd usbcore snd_soc_cb_modac_ts snd_soc_modac snd_soc_sirfsoc_i2s snd_s
oc_ts_stream_mode snd_soc_sirfsoc snd_soc_core snd_pcm snd_timer snd
soundcore snd_page_alloc sirfsoc_bl sirfsoc_fb cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbf
illrect
[<c008a8d8>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x14) from [<c009edfc>]
(warn_on_slowpath+0x4c/0x68)
[<c009edb0>] (warn_on_slowpath+0x0/0x68) from [<c011c1b0>]
(mark_buffer_dirty+0x9c/0xb8)
r6:c0ad1000 r5:c0340970 r4:c349b7f0
[<c011c114>] (mark_buffer_dirty+0x0/0xb8) from [<c015b84c>]
(journal_update_superblock+0xcc/0x14c)
r5:c3a319c0 r4:c38da000
[<c015b780>] (journal_update_superblock+0x0/0x14c) from [<c015ba84>]
(__journal_abort_soft+0xc8/0xd8)
r7:c38da000 r6:fffffffb r5:c3a319c0 r4:c38da000
[<c015b9bc>] (__journal_abort_soft+0x0/0xd8) from [<c015baa4>]
(journal_abort+0x10/0x14)
r6:c3493860 r5:fffffffb r4:c349b748
[<c015ba94>] (journal_abort+0x0/0x14) from [<c0158324>]
(journal_commit_transaction+0xa64/0x14a0)
[<c01578c0>] (journal_commit_transaction+0x0/0x14a0) from [<c015c6d8>]
(kjournald+0xc4/0x29c)
[<c015c614>] (kjournald+0x0/0x29c) from [<c00b5818>] (kthread+0x54/0x80)
[<c00b57c4>] (kthread+0x0/0x80) from [<c00a1ec8>] (do_exit+0x0/0x818)
r5:00000000 r4:00000000
---[ end trace 494b15a74f793f7d ]---
mmcblk2: error -110 sending read/write command
mmcblk2: error -110 requesting status
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk2, sector 1576855
Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk2p1, logical block 197099
lost page write due to I/O error on mmcblk2p1
journal commit I/O error
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs error (device mmcblk2p1): ext3_put_super: Couldn't clean up the
journal
Remounting filesystem read-only
The above two problems weren't happened at 2.6.27/23 kernel, and with
vfat partition.
I wonder such two operations are forbidden for ext3 , especially after
2.6.27 or there is something wrong with our code?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
Best regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-19 5:38 Ext3 is supported not well at 2.6.28 for external SD card removal Peter Chen
2009-10-19 5:59 ` Marek Vasut
2009-10-19 6:12 ` tommy.hong
2009-10-19 13:38 ` Daniel Mack
2009-10-19 15:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-20 5:34 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2009-10-20 7:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-19 7:46 ` Peter Chen
2009-10-19 8:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-19 8:29 ` Peter Chen
2009-10-19 12:28 ` Steve Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADD4BE0.7050806@gmail.com \
--to=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.