From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] raw/linux-aio: Also initialize POSIX AIO
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:12:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADD8D27.7090705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256031192-8292-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
Am 20.10.2009 11:33, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> When using Linux AIO raw still falls back to POSIX AIO sometimes, so we should
> initialize it.
>
> Not initializing it happens to work if POSIX AIO is used by another drive, or
> if the format is not specified (probing the format uses POSIX AIO) or by pure
> luck (e.g. it doesn't seem to happen any more with qcow2 since we have re-added
> synchronous qcow2 functions).
On that note, falling back to POSIX AIO means that paio_submit is called
with a Linux AIO aio_ctx. Which works because this parameter is unused
anyway, but am I the only one to find this ugly?
What is the public interface of paio_submit meant to look like at all?
If aio_ctx is guaranteed to be unused, why not drop it or pass NULL at
least? And if it could be used some time in the future, the raw block
driver needs to be fixed.
That said, I don't even think that the raw block driver is the right
place to distinguish between different AIO variants. Having a generic
aio_submit that calls the right AIO driver depending on the context
would be much cleaner. This would also mean that laio_submit handles the
fallback to paio_submit on its own, which I think is much cleaner than
teaching raw about the capabilities of each driver.
Does this make sense or is there this little detail that is too easy to
miss?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 9:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw/linux-aio: Also initialize POSIX AIO Kevin Wolf
2009-10-20 10:12 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2009-10-22 8:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-22 9:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-10-25 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-26 8:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-10-28 8:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ADD8D27.7090705@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.