Re: 'make policy' issues

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>]

Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
>> My impression is that one of the patches carried by the distributions
>> for flex is needed for checkpolicy to work, but no one has ever fully
>> investigated the precise dependency - people just grab the Fedora srpm
>> and apply those patches to flex, and then rebuild checkpolicy and it
>> works.  I haven't seen any complaints from Debian or Gentoo so I presume
>> that they also carry the same patches for flex.
>
> Just for reference, Gentoo only has the gcc44 one in portage (plus two 
> others that seem unrelated), and it build the refpolicy fine here.
>
> --Mike
>
> -- 
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to 
> majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
>
just looking at the Makefile there is some
stuff in there pointing to xmldtd,etc..
In the case like me(LFS) xmldtd was built
but gtkdoc was not. Wondering if one needs to
build the doc generating tools to not hit any
odd things.

Justin P. Mattock

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.