From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0fxd-00075F-GK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:31:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0fxY-00071U-Gn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:31:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60673 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N0fxY-00071G-59 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:30:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f221.google.com ([209.85.219.221]:57792) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0fxX-0008Tm-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:30:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ew0-f221.google.com with SMTP id 21so5568377ewy.8 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ADF535B.9090308@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:30:51 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Export function for VA defined ram allocation References: <1256117106-9475-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1256117106-9475-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4ADF1AE4.8020004@codemonkey.ws> <4ADF3CB5.9090700@codemonkey.ws> <80C7ACF1-A6F3-4212-8AFB-E97C23C98218@suse.de> <4ADF4DAA.1030501@codemonkey.ws> <0103B4C8-A94C-4556-95A0-FAFEBA436624@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <0103B4C8-A94C-4556-95A0-FAFEBA436624@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Carsten Otte , qemu-devel Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 21.10.2009, at 20:06, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Alexander Graf wrote: >>> So you would prefer a special #ifdef for s390 in generic code over a >>> specifically for this purpose exported function? >>> >>> Well, you're the boss. I like the special function better, but >>> whatever you say. >> >> How is someone supposed to figure out what _qemu_ram_alloc is for? >> Nothing in your patch really indicates that. >> >> However, an ugly #ifdef immediately tells someone, oh, s390 kvm needs >> this terrible hack, so let's keep bugging those guys to eliminate the >> need for that. > > Alright :-). Any other complaints? If not I'd spin up v3. Nope. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Alex >