From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0r3g-0004WX-Ro for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:22:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0r3c-0004Vr-57 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:22:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49302 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N0r3b-0004Vo-R8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:21:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46413) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0r3b-0005Dz-F0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:21:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4ADFF9FE.6090901@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:21:50 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1255516409-19166-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <1256055443-5563-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> <4ADDF521.1070307@redhat.com> <4ADF7A62.8000706@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <4ADF7A62.8000706@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Makefile: Change make to be quiet again when doing nothing List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: QEMU Developers On 10/21/2009 11:17 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Paolo Bonzini schrieb: >> On 10/20/2009 06:17 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: >>> This patch makes make quiet again. >>> >>> There is already a similar patch from Juan Quintela, >>> but maybe this shorter form is preferred. >> >> This patch would reintroduce an ordering problem between building >> config*.h and building the tools, whose fix is what made "make" noisy >> in the first place. >> >> Paolo > > Did you try this? config*.h will be built first, tools and docs come > later with my patch, > so there should not be any difference regarding the build order. No, but if there is a hidden missing dependency I don't see how your patch could work, that's it. I know that the patch is "in theory" correct, but people were reporting failed builds and Juan's move of $(TOOLS) $(DOCS) solved it. Consider in addition that make does not guarantee to even *start* A before B if you have "TARGET: A B", especially at very high parallelism. If you have icecream installed, a make -j20 is not uncommon and guaranteed to find wrong dependencies. Paolo