From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N14Mq-0004sW-Ml
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:34:40 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N14Ml-0004rT-DK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:34:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35037 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N14Ml-0004rQ-81
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:34:35 -0400
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:14279)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1N14Mk-000696-St
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:34:35 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1856426fgg.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AE0C1D4.8080309@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:34:28 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] Some networking code re-organization
References: <1256230156-29652-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1256230156-29652-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
>         We've been meaning to split net.c up for quite a while now,
> so here goes with a first cut at.
>
>         There shouldn't be anything too controversial here, apart
> from CONFIG_LINUX maybe.
>
>         I've build tested this on F11, F12 and mingw and also done
> some basic runtime testing.
>
>         Building on e.g. *BSD, Solaris and AIX hasn't been tested.
> I wouldn't be surprised if I've broken the build there despite all
> my efforts but, if I have, it should be trivial to fix back up.
>
>         This isn't the end of the cleanups; obviously the other
> backends could be split out too, we could use module construtors, etc.
>   

This series doesn't build for me.  I get dependency errors even after a 
full rebuild.  I'm building from a separate directory fwiw.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
>
>
>