From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] epoll: Add support for restoring many epoll items Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:56:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4AE242A1.3090901@librato.com> References: <8e4344b801150b95cd54f2d09b660525601de256.1255971848.git.matthltc@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8e4344b801150b95cd54f2d09b660525601de256.1255971848.git.matthltc-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Helsley Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Matt Helsley wrote: > This completes the work necessary to make checkpoint/restart of > thousands of epoll items more reliable when higher order kmallocs > would fail. We grab a piece of memory suitable to store a "chunk" > of items for input. Read the input one chunk at a time and add > epoll items for each item in the chunk. > > Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley As with patch 2/3, I prefer constant chunk size. Otherwise: Acked-by: Oren Laadan