From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Latest unstable detects cpu speed incorrectly Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:46:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4AE74E21.5050407@goop.org> References: <4AE7208F.1090305@dataproof.fi> <4AE720FD.3020005@dataproof.fi> <4AE7217B.8070507@dataproof.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AE7217B.8070507@dataproof.fi> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Valtteri Kiviniemi Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/27/09 09:36, Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote: > Hi, > > I also noticed that I dont have "[ ] Paravirtualization layer for > spinlocks" enabled in kernel. Should that be enabled? It's not required. It may help overall system load on loaded systems (where there are consistently more runnable vcpus than pcpus), but it can also slow things down. I generally recommend turning it off on problematic systems in order to simplify things (there have been bugs in that code in the past, and its all fairly subtle). J