From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: huge tcp performance-regression on pvops - kernel
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:42:10 -0700
Message-ID: <4AE75B22.9010107@goop.org>
References: <772738655.1349530.1256675670246.JavaMail.tomcat55@mrmseu2.kundenserver.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <772738655.1349530.1256675670246.JavaMail.tomcat55@mrmseu2.kundenserver.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ronny.Hegewald@online.de
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 10/27/09 13:34, Ronny.Hegewald@online.de wrote:
>>
>> >> Cc=C2=B9ing Jeremy. I think the patch of interest in linux-2.6.18-x=
en
>> is 776,
>> >> which is the one that removes those lines from the front/back
>> drivers in
>> >> favour of a solution integrated into the protocol stack.
>>
>> >> -- Keir
>>
>>
>> Right, i patched it with 776 to solve the regression, not with 774.
>> Copied the wrong changeset in the email....
>>
>> And only the netback part, because the netfront-part of the patch
>> isnt in the pvops-kernel or upstream.
>  =20

I'm about to push this into xen.git.

    J