All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iproute uses too small of a receive buffer
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:04:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE8A3C3.1070003@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE8A098.8040207@trash.net>

On 10/28/2009 12:50 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:

>> And, even 1MB may not be enough for some scenarios.  So, probably best to
>> let users over-ride the initial setting on cmd-line.  If not, then use
>> a large value to start with.
>
> How about this? It uses 1MB as receive buf limit by default (without
> increasing /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max it will be limited by less
> however) and allows to specify the size manually using "-rcvbuf X"
> (-r is already used, so you need to specify at least -rc).
>
> Additionally rtnl_listen() continues on ENOBUFS after printing the
> error message.

Looks good..except:

If rmem_max is smaller than 1M, will that cause setsocktopt to
fail and thus fail early out of rtnl_open_byproto?

Maybe we should only print errors but not return in that method
when setsockopt fails?

In another project, I ended up trying ever smaller values until one
worked in order to get near what the user wanted even if rmem_max
was configured smaller.  Not sure if that is worth doing here or not.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-28 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-27 23:16 iproute uses too small of a receive buffer Ben Greear
2009-10-27 23:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 23:30   ` Ben Greear
2009-10-28  7:01     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28  7:09       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28  7:37       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28  7:52   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28  7:55     ` David Miller
2009-10-28 19:05     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 19:19       ` Ben Greear
2009-10-28 19:50         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 20:04           ` Ben Greear [this message]
2009-10-28 20:07             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 20:21               ` Ben Greear
2009-11-10 17:15           ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-28 20:38         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-29  8:17       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE8A3C3.1070003@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.