From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, paulus@au1.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf_events: zero time running and enabled, but non-zero count
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:13:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEA2FB9.6060305@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE50B55.4070706@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Anyone had a chance to look at this test case yet?
Regards,
- Corey
Corey Ashford wrote:
> On 10/23/2009 01:57 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Corey Ashford<cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Btw., you might want to consider putting such testcases into a new
>>>> 'perf test' kind of utility (under tools/perf/builtin-test.c) that
>>>> does various tests such as reading a count and validating the
>>>> time-running/time-enabled values - so that we can see any bugs
>>>> directly.
>>>
>>> I'll see if I can put the test case in some sort of acceptable format
>>> like that. Maybe we can use this one test case as the starting point
>>> for builtin-test.c.
>>
>> Yeah. Feel free to add just something minimal that solves your problem.
>> Others will add their testcases too i'm sure, once the basic command is
>> there.
>>
>> Ingo
>
> Hi Ingo and Paul,
>
> I followed the directions Ingo provided for getting the -tip tree and
> then attempted to build the perf tool that's in it and it doesn't build.
> I'm getting this error on a Power5 box:
>
> ../../lib/find_next_bit.c: In function ‘ext2_swabp’:
> ../../lib/find_next_bit.c:168: warning: passing argument 1 of
> ‘__swab64p’ from incompatible pointer type
> make: *** [util/find_next_bit.o] Error 1
>
> I looked at the code and it looks ok to me. There's a cast from an
> "unsigned long *" to a "unsigned long long *", but those types should be
> of the same size (in -m64 mode), so I don't know why this is failing.
>
> Some good news is that I have created a simple test case which
> demonstrates the bug, but I haven't formulated it in the builtin-test.c
> format yet, since I have been able to build perf.
>
> If you toss the attached file into the perf source directory and compile
> it as follows:
>
> gcc -m64 -o petb perf_events_time_bug.c -lrt
>
> it will show the error:
> % ./petb
> [0] = 1
> [1] = 0 <- time enabled
> [2] = 0 <- time running
> [3] = 4559d1f8
> [4] = 1
> test failed!
>
> perf_events_time_bug.c -lrt
>
> If you compile it with:
>
> gcc -DDO_DISABLE -m66 -o petb perf_events_time_bug.c -lrt
>
> This will disable the event before reading it and then you will get the
> correct times.
>
> % ./petb
> [0] = 1
> [1] = 2a50c1c8 <- time enabled
> [2] = 2a50c1c8 <- time running
> [3] = 460dea97
> [4] = 2
> test passed!
>
--
Regards,
- Corey
Corey Ashford
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center, Linux Toolchain
Beaverton, OR
503-578-3507
cjashfor@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-23 19:16 perf_events: zero time running and enabled, but non-zero count Corey Ashford
[not found] ` <20091023193246.GA3139@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4AE21655.6040403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-10-23 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-26 2:37 ` Corey Ashford
2009-10-30 0:13 ` Corey Ashford [this message]
2009-11-02 21:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-03 0:27 ` Corey Ashford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AEA2FB9.6060305@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.