All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: intrapositioned  and extrapositioned negation
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:56:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEAB864.4030205@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE95AA2.4000601@chello.at>

Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> today I installed iptables 1.4.5 and discovered my ruleset produces
>> those warnings about intrapositioned  negation:
>> Using intrapositioned negation (`--option ! this`) is deprecated in
>> favor of extrapositioned (`! --option this`).
>>
>> I haven't completely looked up the changelogs, but from what I've
>> found on the internet, this was introduced with 1.4.3.1, right?
>>
>> However, my ruleset is automatically generated by a self written shell
>> script, which I now need to change.
>> It needs to work with any 2.6 kernel and with 2.4 kernels supporting
>> iptables.
>> As my testing options (hardware, time) are limited, I'm asking if
>> someone knows:
>>
>> Will 2.4 kernels and older iptables versions accept the
>> extrapositioned (`! --option this`) notation?
>> If so, I can rewrite my script to always use extrapositioned syntax.
>> Lot's of work, but ok...
>>
>> If not, what kernel / iptables versions do only understand the old
>> deprecated way?
>> So I can query for them and take the appropriate steps.
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
> 
> 
> Nobody knows?
> Well, I've found some old virtual machines, tested it with debian woody
> and sarge, using kernel 2.4.18.bf2-4 and 2.6.18 and extrapositioned
> negation does not seem to cause problems.
> Am I right to assume, that all 2.4 kernels with iptables support - DON'T
> have troubles using extrapositioned negation???

The kernel doesn't care about how you specify negation, its purely
a userspace thing. So yes, it should work properly on any kernel
version.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-30  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-20 10:59 intrapositioned and extrapositioned negation Mart Frauenlob
2009-10-29  9:04 ` Mart Frauenlob
2009-10-30  9:56   ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-30 14:48 Mart Frauenlob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEAB864.4030205@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.