From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: netdev: allow ethtool physical id to drop rtnl_lock
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:47:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEB26BB.1050007@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091030104201.6bb03b23@nehalam>
Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> The ethtool operation to blink LED can take an indeterminately long time,
> blocking out other operations (via rtnl_lock). This patch is an attempt
> to work around the problem.
>
> It does need more discussion, because it will mean that drivers that formerly
> were protected from changes during blink aren't. For example, user could
> start device blinking, and then plug in cable causing change netlink event
> to change state or pull cable and have device come down.
>
> The other possibility is to do this on a driver by driver basis
> which is more effort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
>
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c 2009-10-30 10:27:23.621917624 -0700
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c 2009-10-30 10:35:53.787670774 -0700
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>
> /*
> @@ -781,6 +782,8 @@ static int ethtool_get_strings(struct ne
> static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> {
> struct ethtool_value id;
> + int err;
> + static int busy;
>
> if (!dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -788,7 +791,21 @@ static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_de
> if (copy_from_user(&id, useraddr, sizeof(id)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - return dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id(dev, id.data);
> + if (busy)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + /* This operation may take a long time, drop lock */
> + busy = 1;
> + dev_hold(dev);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> + err = dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id(dev, id.data);
> +
> + rtnl_lock();
> + dev_put(dev);
> + busy = 0;
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
It seems reasonable, but why have a global 'busy' flag, and not
private to each netdev ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-30 17:42 RFC: netdev: allow ethtool physical id to drop rtnl_lock Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-30 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-10-30 18:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-31 16:44 ` Michael Chan
2009-11-02 8:17 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 16:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-02 18:29 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AEB26BB.1050007@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.