From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Erick Mattos <erick.mattos@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Changed timestamp behavior of options -c/-C/--amend
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:56:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEB6104.3080005@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256931394-9338-1-git-send-email-erick.mattos@gmail.com>
Erick Mattos schrieb:
> @@ -61,13 +62,16 @@ OPTIONS
> -C <commit>::
> --reuse-message=<commit>::
> Take an existing commit object, and reuse the log message
> - and the authorship information (including the timestamp)
> - when creating the commit.
> + and the authorship information when creating the commit.
> + By default, timestamp is taken from specified commit unless
> + option --new-timestamp is included.
>
> -c <commit>::
> --reedit-message=<commit>::
> Like '-C', but with '-c' the editor is invoked, so that
> the user can further edit the commit message.
> + By default, timestamp is recalculated and not taken from
> + specified commit unless option --old-timestamp is included.
>
> -F <file>::
> --file=<file>::
> @@ -134,6 +138,8 @@ OPTIONS
> current tip -- if it was a merge, it will have the parents of
> the current tip as parents -- so the current top commit is
> discarded.
> + By default, timestamp is taken from latest commit unless option
> + --new-timestamp is included.
I don't like this a lot. Currently, we consistently (and predictably!)
reuse the timestamp when the author information is reused. Therefore, I
think it should be sufficient to introduce only --new-timestamp.
-- Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-30 19:36 [PATCH] Changed timestamp behavior of options -c/-C/--amend Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 20:26 ` Jeff King
2009-10-30 21:22 ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:10 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-10-31 23:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-10-30 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:20 ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 22:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 23:12 ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-31 0:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-31 1:42 ` Erick Mattos
[not found] ` <55bacdd30910301505xe712b74m837dc862a6ee953@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-30 22:13 ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:30 ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 21:56 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AEB6104.3080005@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=erick.mattos@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.