All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, carlos@systemhalted.org,
	randolph@tausq.org
Subject: Re: Out of order unwind entry warning
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:39:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEBE9BF.6070403@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091031021925.GA425@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

On 10/31/2009 03:19 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, John David Anglin wrote:
>
>> There seems to a problem with readelf -u on 32-bit kernels.  The
>> address ranges are wrong.  The segment offset doesn't seem to be
>> being handled correctly.
>
> readelf -u uses the base address of the segment containing the
> .PARISC.unwind section.  On 64-bit kernels, the .PARISC.unwind
> section is in the same segment as the .text section, so the
> addresses print are correct.  However, on recent 32-bit kernels,
> this is not the case:
>
>   Section to Segment mapping:
>    Segment Sections...
>     00     .text .rodata .init.rodata __bug_table .pci_fixup .builtin_fw __ksymtab __ksymtab_gpl __kcrctab __kcrctab_gpl __ksymtab_strings __param
>     01     __ex_table .PARISC.unwind .data.read_mostly .data .got .data.vmpages .bss
>     02     .data.init_task .init.text .init.data .init.setup .initcall.init .con_initcall.init .exit.text
>     03
>
> .PARISC.unwind is readonly, so it shouldn't be in a W segment.


apply the patch in http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/55797/ before testing.
.PARISC.unwind is then still in a RW segment, but at least you will get more reliable output.

Helge

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-31  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-26 22:21 Out of order unwind entry warning Helge Deller
2009-10-26 23:41 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-10-27  1:50   ` Randolph Chung
2009-10-27  2:24     ` Kyle McMartin
2009-10-27 23:19 ` John David Anglin
2009-10-28 21:42   ` Helge Deller
2009-10-28 22:00     ` Helge Deller
2009-10-28 23:10       ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 20:51         ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29 13:20       ` Carlos O'Donell
2009-10-28 22:18     ` John David Anglin
2009-10-28 22:43       ` Helge Deller
2009-10-28 22:59         ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29  2:11           ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 16:38             ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 19:16           ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 20:46             ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29 21:07               ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 22:22                 ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29 23:35                   ` John David Anglin
2009-10-30 22:47                     ` Helge Deller
2009-10-31  0:41                       ` John David Anglin
2009-10-31  2:19                         ` John David Anglin
2009-10-31  7:39                           ` Helge Deller [this message]
2009-11-01 23:16                       ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02  1:40                         ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02  2:34                           ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02 21:02                             ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 21:50                               ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02 22:20                                 ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 22:31                                   ` James Bottomley
2009-11-02 22:43                                     ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 22:52                                   ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 23:23                                     ` John David Anglin
2009-11-03 21:10                                       ` Helge Deller
2009-11-03 21:36                                         ` John David Anglin
2009-11-03 21:43                                           ` Helge Deller
2009-11-03 21:54                                             ` John David Anglin
2009-11-03 22:04                                               ` Helge Deller
2009-11-04  0:57                                                 ` John David Anglin
2009-11-06 23:07                                                   ` Helge Deller
2009-11-07 20:11                                                     ` Kyle McMartin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEBE9BF.6070403@gmx.de \
    --to=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.