From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:46:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com> References: <20091102161722.eea4358d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39646 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754140AbZKBJrj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 04:47:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091102161722.eea4358d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Tejun Heo , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra On 11/02/2009 07:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/user-return-notifier.c: In function 'fire_user_return_notifiers': > kernel/user-return-notifier.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token > > Introduced by commit 7c68af6e32c73992bad24107311f3433c89016e2 ("core, > x86: Add user return notifiers") from the tip and kvm trees but revealed > by commit e0fdb0e050eae331046385643618f12452aa7e73 ("percpu: add __percpu > for sparse") from the percpu tree. Before that percpu tree commit, > "put_cpu_var()" would compile without error (even though it really needs > a parameter). > > I have applied the following patch for today. > Ingo, can you queue this on x86/entry? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function