All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunn <andrew.g.dunn@gmail.com>
To: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Setup for Performance
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:00:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEF7286.6080509@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AEF6E91.3090902@sauce.co.nz>

Just quick searching around:

"Using a LSISAS 1068E I/O processor with Fusion-MPT (Message Passing
Technology) for optimum RAID performance and a PCI Express host
interface for increased bandwidth, these UIO internal RAID adapters
deliver an intelligent and robust RAID solution."

http://www.lsi.com/storage_home/products_home/standard_product_ics/sas_ics/lsisas1068e/index.html

I am not sure if iozone was used correctly here:

storrgie@ALEXANDRIA:/mnt/ARRAY$ iozone -s 4096
    Run began: Mon Nov  2 18:02:41 2009

    File size set to 4096 KB
    Command line used: iozone -s 4096
    Output is in Kbytes/sec
    Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
    Processor cache size set to 1024 Kbytes.
    Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes.
    File stride size set to 17 * record size.
                                                            random 
random    bkwd   record   stride                                  
              KB  reclen   write rewrite    read    reread    read  
write    read  rewrite     read   fwrite frewrite   fread  freread
            4096       4  670491 1309061  2432098  2163764 2205712
1148325 2123381  1300736  2214241   647788  1131832 2419425  2079181

I did not set any of the file system settings when creating my array's
file system, I simply did a mkfs.ext4 on the device. This leads me to
believe that I lost some of the performance due to my laziness.


Richard Scobie wrote:
> Andrew Dunn wrote:
>
>> My original array was a raid6 of 9 WD caviar black drives, the chunk
>> size was 64k. I use USAS-AOC-L8i controllers to address all of my drives
>> and the TLER setting on the drives is enabled for 7 seconds.
>
>> I have noticed slow rebuilding time when I first created the array and
>> intermittent lockups while writing large data sets.
>
> Does the USAS-AOC-L8i use a Marvell controller?
>
> If so, someone was posting here recently that they have problems with
> it locking up under md RAID loads. Have a look over the past couple of
> months archives.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard

-- 
Andrew Dunn
http://agdunn.net


      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-02 22:05 Setup for Performance Andrew Dunn
2009-11-02 23:43 ` Richard Scobie
2009-11-03  0:00   ` Andrew Dunn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEF7286.6080509@gmail.com \
    --to=andrew.g.dunn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.