From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xtables: deactivate intrapositional support Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:39:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4AF078D2.9050601@trash.net> References: <1256891969-18437-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <1256891969-18437-3-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> <4AEF0636.6010604@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Netfilter Core Team To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:50866 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752924AbZKCSjR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:39:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 2009-11-02 17:17, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> In going to fix NF bug #611, "argv" would be needed in >>> xtables_check_inverse to set "optarg" to the right spot in case of an >>> intrapositional negation. Adding argv to the parameter list would >>> cause an API change, which I would like to avoid because it is >>> planned to be thrown out anyway. >>> >>> So deactive intrapositional support now already, but leave the error >>> message (which has already been there for two releases). Slightly >>> adjust it, because some users have been wondering whether iptables >>> or they are at "fault". >> I'm worried that this is too early, two releases is not particulary >> long and I'd expect a lot of people haven't noticed the warning yet, >> especially on headless systems. Looking at bug #611, we've never >> claimed "-ptcp" would be supported, so this hardly justifies the >> risk IMO. >> >> At least this needs more discussion, I'd like to hear a few more >> opinions on this. >> > Given the ultimate shortage of developers on NF these days, I am unsure > there are that many opinions left. I was unaware that there's an urgent need to add incompatibilities.