From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Strange error in domU after dom0 update
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:04:07 -0800
Message-ID: <4AF1EC47.5000109@goop.org>
References: <4AE0C9E9.4010405@goop.org>
	<20091023132840.yd6yyujmck448sc8@webmail.flonatel.org>
	<20091023180154.j3n1ik6w0k8gkcco@webmail.flonatel.org>
	<20091027154416.n6j0pou4sg4kwg8g@webmail.flonatel.org>
	<4AE73BF8.1070004@goop.org>
	<20091029121425.exvwzj3e8soww000@webmail.flonatel.org>
	<4AEA1319.6010608@goop.org>
	<20091030102434.hgb31gr74o00w8ws@webmail.flonatel.org>
	<20091030111126.GA24905@weybridge.uk.xensource.com>
	<20091103112924.o15pxnof4gc8gsgc@webmail.flonatel.org>
	<20091104090453.GA1611@weybridge.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091104090453.GA1611@weybridge.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Steven Smith <steven.smith@citrix.com>
Cc: Steven Smith <Steven.Smith@eu.citrix.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Andreas Florath <xen@flonatel.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/04/09 01:04, Steven Smith wrote:
>> Looks good for me: reinstalled everything with patched version - iSCSI  
>> functionality and performance is ok. No errors / warnings about  
>> 'netfront: rx->offset' any more.
>>     
> Great.  Thanks for testing this.
>
> Could you apply the patch to your tree, please, Jeremy?
>   

It should already be there.  I applied it shortly after you posted it,
since it looked reasonable independent of whether it solved Andreas's
problem.

    J