Re: [QGIT PATCH/RFC]

[Abdelrazak Younes <younes@lyx.org>]

Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>  Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Marco Costalba wrote:
> >>
> >>> uint qHash(const ShaString& s) { // fast path, called 6-7 times
> >>> per revision
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Function:
> >>
> >> uint qHash(const QByteArray&);
> >>
> >> is already defined in the Qt Core libraries, so I have a link
> >> error with your patch.
> >>
> >
> > By the way, this function of yours is not used anywhere AFAICS.
>
>  Ok, now I understand that this is used by QHash, sorry.
>
>  I have gcc-4.4.1 so maybe that's the reason why linking works in my
>  case. But I don't which version of the qhash() function does take
>  precedence...

FYI I just verified that your version does take precedence over the Qt one.

Anyway, if you like the patch, we could just inherit from QByteArray 
instead of typedef it so that it links with your system.

Out of curiosity I just had a look at the two versions, yours:

********************************
// definition of an optimized sha hash function
static inline uint hexVal(const uchar* ch) {
    return (*ch < 64 ? *ch - 48 : *ch - 87);
}

uint qHash(const ShaString& s) { // fast path, called 6-7 times per revision

    const uchar* ch = reinterpret_cast<const uchar*>(s.data());

    return (hexVal(ch ) << 24)
        + (hexVal(ch + 2) << 20)
        + (hexVal(ch + 4) << 16)
        + (hexVal(ch + 6) << 12)
        + (hexVal(ch + 8) << 8)
        + (hexVal(ch + 10) << 4)
        + hexVal(ch + 12);
}
********************************

And Qt's version:

********************************
static uint hash(const uchar *p, int n)
{
    uint h = 0;
    uint g;

    while (n--) {
        h = (h << 4) + *p++;
        if ((g = (h & 0xf0000000)) != 0)
            h ^= g >> 23;
        h &= ~g;
    }
    return h;
}

uint qHash(const QBitArray &bitArray)
{
    int m = bitArray.d.size() - 1;
    uint result = hash(reinterpret_cast<const uchar 
*>(bitArray.d.constData()), qMax(0, m));

    // deal with the last 0 to 7 bits manually, because we can't trust that
    // the padding is initialized to 0 in bitArray.d
    int n = bitArray.size();
    if (n & 0x7)
        result = ((result << 4) + bitArray.d.at(m)) & ((1 << n) - 1);
    return result;
}

********************************

I recompiled qgit with the Qt version and I didn't notice any 
performance problem with a big repo (Qt).

Just tell me if this is not interesting to you and I'll shut up :-)

Abdel.