From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4AF3094F.3000705@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:20:15 -0800 From: Gus Wirth MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4AF21525.3080008@gmail.com> <20091105024904.GA29859@Linus-Debian> In-Reply-To: <20091105024904.GA29859@Linus-Debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Any results from BattleMesh 2009? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net On 11/04/2009 06:49 PM, Linus L=FCssing wrote: [snip] > PS: Just out of curiosity and also because the reports are in > progress right now, what kind of results are you expecting? Things I'm curious about: How was the mesh configured? What tools did you use to test the mesh? How does the mesh react to the addition of a node? How long does it take=20 a new node to integrate itself into the mesh? How does the mesh react to the removal of a node? How long does it take=20 the mesh to react to the node removal? How does the mesh handle interference? Did you have anything to generate=20 interference for testing? What tools were used to visualize the mesh? Any images available? Results of throughput testing for one hop, two hop, etc. What was the CPU load on the mesh nodes while relaying traffic? What=20 were the nodes? I'll probably have more questions later. Gus