From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4AF964C2.3060206@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:04:02 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4AF87D53.9090102@domain.hid> <4AF947FA.4030908@domain.hid> <4AF9571F.7090500@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4AF9571F.7090500@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [pull request] heap reference and trivial build fixes List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-core Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> The following changes since commit 6d7d6bc436ef3d1fb51fa8de06d4ecf004e3b6a5: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix (1): >>> nucleus: defer selector block deletion to an APC. >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-upstream >>> >>> Jan Kiszka (2): >>> nucleus: Track heap mapping on to mm-clone >>> nucleus: Fix trivial build warning >>> >>> ksrc/nucleus/heap.c | 12 +++++++++++- >>> ksrc/nucleus/module.c | 2 +- >>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> Hi Jan, >> >> do you agree if I add the notification to the xenomai-git mailing list >> for your tree? It makes it possible to review your patches without any >> action on your side. Note that a recent modification to the notification >> mechanism only shows the relevant patches. >> > > No problem. Ah, the new filter looks nice! > > And how would my new workflow look like? Just silently push into > 'for-upstream'? Well, it does not work for me, because I always realize that I screwed up AFTER I push the changes. Besides, we may push things only for review, so, I would keep the pull requests and the discussions on the list, only avoid publishing the patches manually on the list. But this is open for discussion of course. -- Gilles