From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4AF993B8.6090402@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:24:24 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4AF87D53.9090102@domain.hid> <4AF947FA.4030908@domain.hid> <4AF9571F.7090500@domain.hid> <4AF964C2.3060206@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4AF964C2.3060206@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig154B4449D2D0F997D34568B5" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [pull request] heap reference and trivial build fixes List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig154B4449D2D0F997D34568B5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> The following changes since commit 6d7d6bc436ef3d1fb51fa8de06d4ecf00= 4e3b6a5: >>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix (1): >>>> nucleus: defer selector block deletion to an APC. >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-upstream >>>> >>>> Jan Kiszka (2): >>>> nucleus: Track heap mapping on to mm-clone >>>> nucleus: Fix trivial build warning >>>> >>>> ksrc/nucleus/heap.c | 12 +++++++++++- >>>> ksrc/nucleus/module.c | 2 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> do you agree if I add the notification to the xenomai-git mailing lis= t >>> for your tree? It makes it possible to review your patches without an= y >>> action on your side. Note that a recent modification to the notificat= ion >>> mechanism only shows the relevant patches. >>> >> No problem. Ah, the new filter looks nice! >> >> And how would my new workflow look like? Just silently push into >> 'for-upstream'? >=20 > Well, it does not work for me, because I always realize that I screwed > up AFTER I push the changes. Besides, we may push things only for > review, so, I would keep the pull requests and the discussions on the > list, only avoid publishing the patches manually on the list. But this > is open for discussion of course. Fine with me as well, specifically as I tend to face similar problems. And as one can pick the patches for citing from xenomai-git, commenting on patching shouldn't be much harder for the reviewer. Jan --------------enig154B4449D2D0F997D34568B5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkr5k88ACgkQitSsb3rl5xQRDgCgoF0lpfNETkwt9nC2QcpW9lvo d8kAn1UuDEzHqbDLm8CQtDB7RBq0FnBS =OHkJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig154B4449D2D0F997D34568B5--