From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Add hypercall to expose physical CPU in xen hypervisor Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:00:25 -0800 Message-ID: <4AF9AA39.4070206@goop.org> References: <4AF891B6.8010003@goop.org> <20091110163626.GC23000@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091110163626.GC23000@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Jiang, Yunhong" , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11/10/09 08:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Here is what checkpatch says: > > WARNING: do not add new typedefs > #523: FILE: include/xen/interface/platform.h:328: > +typedef struct xen_physical_cpuinfo xen_physical_cpuinfo_t; > > WARNING: do not add new typedefs > #537: FILE: include/xen/interface/platform.h:342: > +typedef struct xenpf_pcpu_info xenpf_pcpu_info_t; > > total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 564 lines checked > > /home/konrad/01-dom0_pcpu.patch has style problems, please review. If any of these errors > are false positives report them to the maintainer, see > CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > Unfortunately I think the typedefs are necessary for the GUEST_HANDLE stuff. J